This paper aims at shedding light on the concept of postmodernism, and its implications in the TESOL. Postmodern philosophy as a prevalent concept and a hot buzzword in philosophy, science, and art is believed to have influenced the TESOL theoretically in some ways. The elements of postmodernism including: constructivism, subjectivism, relativism, localism, and pragmatism are found to have been applied in the TESOL to the concept of the demise of the methods, more focus on styles, strategies, and multiple intelligences, chaos/complexity theory and critical theories. But in practice, in developing countries the TESOL still lives in the modern era.
Allwright, R. L. (2003). “Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in Language teaching”, Learning Teaching Research 7, pp. 113-141.
Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations (P. Foss, P. Patton, and J. Johnston, Trans.), New York: Semiotest(e).
Blackburn, S. (1994). The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, OUP.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th Ed.), London: Longman.
Brown, H. D. (2002). “English language teaching in the “post-method” era: Toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment”, in J.C. Richards and W. A. Renandya, Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9-18.
Cahoone, L. (2003). From Modernism to Postmodernism: An Anthology, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Davis, K. A., and Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2004). “Gender and language education” [Special issue], TESOL Quarterly 38(3).
Derrida, J. (1976). On Grammatology (G. Spivak, Trans.), Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: Analyzing Learner Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foucault, M. (1973). The Order of Things:An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1979). What is an author? Screen 21, pp. 34-67.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New York: Herder and Herder.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind, New York: Basic Books.
Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis (T. McCarthy, Trans.), Boston: Beacon Press.
Kelly, L. (1969). Twenty-five Centuries of Language Teaching, Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). “The post-method condition: Emerging strategies for second/foreign language teaching”, TESOL Quarterly 28, pp. 27-48.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1999). “Critical classroom discourse analysis”, TESOL Quarterly 33, pp. 453-484.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). “Toward postmethod pedagogy”, TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), pp. 537-560.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003a). “Critical language pedagogy: A postmethod perspective on English language teaching”, World Englishes, 22(4), pp. 539-550.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003b). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). “TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends”, TESOL Quarterly 40(1), pp. 59-81.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). “Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition”, Applied Linguistics 18, pp. 141-165.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). “Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective”, in Claire Kramsch (ed.), Langauge Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives, London and New York: Continuum, pp. 33-46.
Long, M. H. (1989). “Process and product in ESL program evaluation”, Paper presented at the 5th Annual TESOL Summer Meeting, Toronto: Canada, July, pp. 21-32.
Long, M. (2003). “Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology”, in C. N. Candlin and N. Mercer (ed.), English Language Teaching in Its Social Context, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 180-187.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Marckwardt, A. (1972). “Changing winds and shifting sands”, MST English Quarterly 21, pp. 3-11.
McArthur, T. (1983). A Foundation Course for Language Teachers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGroarty, M. (1998). “Constructive and constructivist challenges for applied linguistics”, Language Learning 48(4), pp. 591-622.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers, New York: Prentice-Hall.
O’Malley, J. M., and Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition, Cambridge: CUP.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Langauge Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know, Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
Pennycook, A. (1989). “The concept of the method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching”, TESOL Quarterly 23, pp. 589-618.
Pennycook, A. (1994). “Incommensurable discourse?”, Applied Linguistics 15, pp. 115-138.
Pennycook, A. (1999). “Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL”, TESOL Quarterly 33, pp. 329-348.
Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Prabhu, N. S. (1990). “There is no best method-why?”, TESOL Quarterly 24, pp. 161-176.
Reid, J. M. (1987). “The learning style preferences of EFL students”, TESOL Quarterly 21, pp. 87-111.
Reinfried, M. (2000). Can radical constructivism achieve a viable basis for foreign language teaching? A refutation of the ‘Wolff-Wendt’ Theorem. Retrieved 09/30/2004, from